Moore’s Law is dead, says Gordon Moore

Gordon Moore

The extrapolation of a trend that was becoming clear even as long ago
as 1965, and has been the pulse of the IT industry ever since will
eventually end, said Moore, who is now retired from Intel.

Forty years after the publication of his law, which states that
transistor density on integrated circuits doubles about every two
years, Moore said this morning: “It can’t continue forever. The nature
of exponentials is that you push them out and eventually disaster
happens.

“In terms of size [of transistor] you can see that we’re approaching
the size of atoms which is a fundamental barrier, but it’ll be two or
three generations before we get that far – but that’s as far out as
we’ve ever been able to see. We have another 10 to 20 years before we
reach a fundamental limit. By then they’ll be able to make bigger chips
and have transistor budgets in the billions.”

As for whether computing have been different without Moore’s Law, he
said: “It’s hard to say – I think it has become a very useful guide. At
the start it didn’t have much impact, but the first place I saw an
impact was when the Japanese entered the memory business. It seemed
then that the industry generally was moving in a random direction but
once the Japanese got into memory they had a plan and were successful
in taking a leading position in that area.

“In that respect, it would have been different if we hadn’t noticed
that trend. I was lucky as I was just in a position to see things
further out than most people, working for Fairchild who were at the
forefront of the technology industry.”

On the anniversary of the April 1965 Electronics magazine article
that made him famous, Moore, who was then head of R&D at
electronics giant Fairchild, also said that he didn’t believe
nanotechnology would supplant electronics anytime soon.

“Integrated circuits were a result of cumulative investment of over
$100bn so to replace that, just springing full-blown from a small base,
is unlikely. Electronics is a mature industry. And we’re already
operating well below 100nm which is seen as the start of nanotech so
we’re there already.

“Building things up from the bottom, atom by atom, comes from a
different direction. It’s not replacing ICs – the technology is being
applied in different fields such as gene chips to do bio-analysis very
quickly, micro-machines in airbags and avionics, micro-fluidics –
chemical labs on a chip.

“Electronics though is a fundamental technology that’s not likely to be
replaced directly. There’s a difference between making a small machine
and connecting them by the billion. Nanotech will have an impact but
it’s not about replacing electronics in the foreseeable future.”

Asked if he foresaw mass market computing, Moore said that he looked
back and, “in the original article I did but had no idea what it would
look like.” He saw home computing as a small market, with applications
such as storing recipes in the home. As a result, Intel – where Moore
by then worked – didn’t pursue that avenue.

Moore also scorned the technology used by the military. He agreed that
the military drove advances in computing when costs were very high as
it gave them capabilities they couldn’t get in any other way, through
the 1960s. “Since then it hasn’t had much impact as the commercial
business timeframe is so much faster than the pace at which military
systems change – they use obsolete electronics in modern military
systems.”

Finally, asked if there were any new laws for next 40 years, he
said: “I’ll rest on my laurels on this one! I’m not close enough now to
make new predictions – several things have been called Moore’s Second
Law but I can’t take credit for any of them.”

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s